The Guardian now has a blow-by-blow breakdown of the whole Blair mess.

Question: Why have we not seen anything like this here, about Bush's actions?

The BBC is, of course, coming across as slightly less biased. They say: "Opposition parties hope that by raising Iraq they will increase doubts in voters' minds about Mr Blair's trustworthiness." I should certainly hope so: your prime minister flat-out lies about what he's been told, and you "hope" it would "increase doubts"? If I were a British citizen, I'd be pushing for a vote of no confidence.